Surah An-Nisa • Ayah 3

Protecting the Property of the OrphansAllah commands that the property of the orphans be surrendered to them in full when they reach the age of adolescence, and He forbids using or confiscating any part of it. So He said;وَلاَ تَتَبَدَّلُواْ الْخَبِيثَ بِالطَّيِّبِ(and do not exchange (your) bad things for (their) good ones;) Sa`id bin Al-Musayyib and Az-Zuhri commented, "Do not substitute a weak animal of yours for a fat animal (of the orphans)." Ibrahim An-Nakha`i and Ad-Dahhak commented, "Do not give something of bad quality for something of good quality." As-Suddi said, "One of them (caretakers of orphans) would take a fat sheep from the orphan's property and put in its place, a weak sheep of his, saying, `A sheep for a sheep.' He would also take a good Dirham and exchange it for a fake Dirham, saying, `A Dirham for a Dirham."' Allah's statement,وَلاَ تَأْكُلُواْ أَمْوَلَهُمْ إِلَى أَمْوَلِكُمْ(and devour not their substance to your substance.) means, do not mix them together so that you eat up both, as Mujahid, Sa`id bin Jubayr, Muqatil bin Hayyan, As-Suddi and Sufyan bin Hassin stated. Allah said,إِنَّهُ كَانَ حُوباً كَبِيراً(Surely, this is a great sin. ), a major and substantial sin, according to Ibn `Abbas. This was also reported from Mujahid, `Ikrimah, Sa`id bin Jubayr, Al-Hasan, Ibn Sirin, Qatadah, Muqatil bin Hayyan, Ad-Dahhak, Abu Malik, Zayd bin Aslam and Abu Sinan. The meaning above is: adding their property to your property is a grave sin and a major mistake, so avoid it.The Prohibition of Marrying Female Orphans Without Giving a DowryAllah said,وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ أَلاَّ تُقْسِطُواْ فِى الْيَتَـمَى فَانكِحُواْ مَا طَابَ لَكُمْ مِّنَ النِّسَآءِ مَثْنَى(And if you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphan girls, then marry (other) women of your choice, two) Allah commands, when one of you is the caretaker of a female orphan and he fears that he might not give her a dowry that is suitable for women of her status, he should marry other women, who are plenty as Allah has not restricted him. Al-Bukhari recorded that `A'ishah said, "A man was taking care of a female orphan and he married her, although he did not desire to marry her. That girl's money was mixed with his, and he was keeping her portion from her. Afterwards, this Ayah was revealed about his case;وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ أَلاَّ تُقْسِطُواْ(If you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly)" Al-Bukhari recorded that `Urwah bin Az-Zubayr said that he asked `A'ishah about the meaning of the statement of Allah,وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ أَلاَّ تُقْسِطُواْ فِى الْيَتَـمَى(If you fear that you shall not be able to deal justly with the orphan girls.) She said, "O my nephew! This is about the orphan girl who lives with her guardian and shares his property. Her wealth and beauty may tempt him to marry her without giving her an adequate dowry which might have been given by another suitor. So, such guardians were forbidden to marry such orphan girls unless they treated them justly and gave them the most suitable dowry; otherwise they were ordered to marry woman besides them." `A'ishah further said, "After that verse, the people again asked the Messenger of Allah ﷺ (about marriage with orphan girls), so Allah revealed the Ayah,وَيَسْتَفْتُونَكَ فِى النِّسَآءِ(They ask your instruction concerning the women..) 4:127." She said, "Allah's statement in this Ayah,وَتَرْغَبُونَ أَن تَنكِحُوهُنَّ(yet whom you desire to marry) 4:127 refers to the guardian who does not desire to marry an orphan girl under his supervision because she is neither wealthy nor beautiful. The guardians were forbidden to marry their orphan girls possessing property and beauty without being just to them, as they generally refrain from marrying them (when they are neither beautiful nor wealthy)."The Permission to Marry Four WomenAllah's statement,مَثْنَى وَثُلَـثَ وَرُبَاعَ(two or three, or four), means, marry as many women as you like, other than the orphan girls, two, three or four. We should mention that Allah's statement in another Ayah,جَاعِلِ الْمَلَـئِكَةِ رُسُلاً أُوْلِى أَجْنِحَةٍ مَّثْنَى وَثُلَـثَ وَرُبَـعَ(Who made the angels messengers with wings, - two or three or four) 35:1, does not mean that other angels do not have more than four wings, as there are proofs that some angels do have more wings. Yet, men are prohibited from marrying more than four wives, as the Ayah decrees, since the Ayah specifies what men are allowed of wives, as Ibn `Abbas and the majority of scholars stated. If it were allowed for them to have more than four wives, the Ayah would have mentioned it. Imam Ahmad recorded that Salim said that his father said that Ghilan bin Salamah Ath-Thaqafi had ten wives when he became Muslim, and the Prophet said to him, "Choose any four of them (and divorce the rest)." During the reign of `Umar, Ghilan divorced his remaining wives and divided his money between his children. When `Umar heard news of this, he said to Ghilan, "I think that the devil has conveyed to your heart the news of your imminent death, from what the devil hears during his eavesdropping. It may as well be that you will not remain alive but for a little longer. By Allah! You will take back your wives and your money, or I will take possession of this all and will order that your grave be stoned as is the case with the grave of Abu Righal (from Thamud, who was saved from their fate because he was in the Sacred Area. But, when he left it, he was tormented like they were)." Ash-Shafi`i, At-Tirmidhi, Ibn Majah, Ad-Daraqutni and Al-Bayhaqi collected this Hadith up to the Prophet's statement, "Choose any four of them." Only Ahmad collected the full version of this Hadith. Therefore, had it been allowed for men to marry more than four women at the same time, the Prophet would have allowed Ghilan to keep more than four of his wives since they all embraced Islam with him. When the Prophet commanded him to keep just four of them and divorce the rest, this indicated that men are not allowed to keep more than four wives at a time under any circumstances. If this is the case concerning those who already had more than four wives upon embracing Islam, then this ruling applies even more so to marrying more than four.Marrying Only One Wife When One Fears He Might not Do Justice to His WivesAllah's statement,فَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ أَلاَّ تَعْدِلُواْ فَوَحِدَةً أَوْ مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَـنُكُمْ(But if you fear that you will not be able to deal justly (with them), then only one or what your right hands possess.) The Ayah commands, if you fear that you will not be able to do justice between your wives by marrying more than one, then marry only one wife, or satisfy yourself with only female captives, for it is not obligatory to treat them equally, rather it is recommended. So if one does so, that is good, and if not, there is no harm on him. In another Ayah, Allah said,وَلَن تَسْتَطِيعُواْ أَن تَعْدِلُواْ بَيْنَ النِّسَآءِ وَلَوْ حَرَصْتُمْ(You will never be able to do perfect justice between wives even if it is your ardent desire) 4:129. Allah said,ذلِكَ أَدْنَى أَلاَّ تَعُولُواْ(That is nearer to prevent you from Ta`ulu), meaning, from doing injustice. Ibn Abi Hatim, Ibn Marduwyah and Abu Hatim Ibn Hibban, in his Sahih, recorded that `A'ishah said that, the Prophet said that the Ayah,ذلِكَ أَدْنَى أَلاَّ تَعُولُواْ(That is nearer to prevent you from Ta`ulu), means, from doing injustice. However, Ibn Abi Hatim said that his father said that this Hadith to the Prophet is a mistake, for it should be attributed to `A'ishah not the Prophet . Ibn Abi Hatim reported from Ibn `Abbas, `A'ishah, Mujahid, `Ikrimah, Al-Hasan, Abu Malik, Abu Razin, An-Nakha`i, Ash-Sha`bi, Ad-Dahhak, `Ata' Al-Khurasani, Qatadah, As-Suddi and Muqatil bin Hayyan that Ta`ulu means to deviate from justice.Giving the Dowry is Obligatory`Ali bin Abi Talhah reported Ibn `Abbas saying, Nihlah, in Allah's statement,وَءَاتُواْ النِّسَآءَ صَدُقَـتِهِنَّ نِحْلَةً(And give to the women (whom you marry) their Saduqat Nihlah) refers to the dowry. Muhammad bin Ishaq narrated from Az-Zuhri that `Urwah said that `A'ishah said that `Nihlah' means `obligatory'. Muqatil, Qatadah and Ibn Jurayj said, `Nihlah' means `obligatory' Ibn Jurayj added: `specified.' Ibn Zayd said, "In Arabic, Nihlah, refers to what is necessary. So Allah is commanding: Do not marry unless you give your wife something that is her right. No person after the Prophet is allowed to marry a woman except with the required dowry, nor by giving false promises about the dowry intended." Therefore, the man is required to pay a dowry to his wife with a good heart, just as he gives a gift with a good heart. If the wife gives him part or all of that dowry with a good heart, her husband is allowed to take it, as it is lawful for him in this case. This is why Allah said afterwards,فَإِن طِبْنَ لَكُمْ عَن شَىْءٍ مِّنْهُ نَفْساً فَكُلُوهُ هَنِيئاً مَّرِيئاً(But if they, of their own pleasure, remit any part of it to you, take it, and enjoy it without fear of any harm.)

یتیموں کی نگہداشت اور چار شادیوں کی اجازت ٭٭اللہ تعالیٰ یتیموں کے والیوں کو حکم دیتا ہے کہ جب یتیم بلوغت اور سمجھداری کو پہنچ جائیں تو ان کے جو مال تمہارے پاس ہوں انہیں سونپ دو، پورے پورے بغیر کمی اور خیانت کے ان کے حوالے کرو، اپنے مالوں کے ساتھ ملا کر گڈمڈ کر کے کھا جانے کی نیت نہ رکھو، حلال رزق جب اللہ رحیم تمہیں دے رہا ہے پھر حرام کی طرف کیوں منہ اٹھاؤ؟ تقدیر کی روزی مل کر ہی رہے گی اپنے حلال مال چھوڑ کر لوگوں کے مالوں کو جو تم پر حرام ہیں نہ لو، دبلا پتلا جانور دے کر موٹا تازہ نہ لو، بوٹی دے کر بکرے کی فکر نہ کرو، ردی دے کر اچھے کی اور کھوٹا دے کر کھرے کی نیت نہ رکھو، پہلے لوگ ایسا کر لیا کرتے تھے کہ یتیموں کی بکریوں کے ریوڑ میں سے عمدہ بکری لے لی اور اپنی دبلی پتلی بکری دے کر گنتی پوری کر دی، کھوٹا درہم اس کے مال میں ڈال کر کھرا نکال لیا اور پھر سمجھ لیا کہ ہم نے تو بکری کے بدلے بکری اور درہم کے بدلے درہم لیا ہے۔ ان کے مالوں میں اپنا مال خلط ملط کر کے پھر یہ حیلہ کر کے اب امتیاز کیا ہے؟ ان کے مال تلف نہ کرو، یہ بڑا گناہ ہے، ایک ضعیف حدیث میں بھی یہی معنی آخری جملے کے مروی ہیں [تفسیر ابن جریر الطبری:525/7:ضعیف] ‏ ابوداؤد کی حدیث میں ایک دعا میں بھی «حوب» کا لفظ گناہ کے معنی میں آیا ہے [سنن ابوداود:3892،قال الشيخ الألباني:ضعیف] ‏ سیدنا ابوایوب رضی اللہ عنہ نے جب اپنی بیوی صاحبہ کو طلاق دینے کا ارادہ کیا تھا تو رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے انہیں فرمایا تھا کہ اس طلاق میں گناہ ہے، [طبرانی کبیر:136/25:ضعیف] ‏ چنانچہ وہ اپنے ارادے سے باز رہے، ایک روایت میں یہ واقعہ سیدنا ابوطلحہ رضی اللہ عنہ اور سیدہ ام سلیم رضی اللہ عنہا کا مروی ہے۔ [مستدرک حاکم:302/2:ضعیف] ‏صفحہ نمبر1491پھر فرماتا ہے کہ تمہاری پرورش میں کوئی یتیم لڑکی ہو اور تم اس سے نکاح کرنا چاہتے ہو لیکن چونکہ اس کا کوئی اور نہیں اس لیے تم تو ایسا نہ کرو کہ مہر اور حقوق میں کمی کر کے اسے اپنے گھر ڈال لو اس سے باز رہو اور عورتیں بہت ہیں جس سے چاہو نکاح کر لو۔ سیدہ عائشہ صدیقہ رضی اللہ عنہا فرماتی ہیں ایک یتیم لڑکی تھی جس کے پاس مال بھی تھا اور باغ بھی جس کی پرورش میں وہ تھی اس نے صرف اس مال کے لالچ میں بغیر اس کا پورا مہر وغیرہ مقرر کرنے کے اس سے نکاح کر لیا جس پر یہ آیت اتری میرا خیال ہے کہ اس باغ اور مال میں یہ لڑکی حصہ دار تھی [صحیح بخاری:4573] ‏ صحیح بخاری میں ہے کہ سیدنا عروہ بن زبیر رضی اللہ عنہما نے سیدہ عائشہ رضی اللہ عنہا سے اس آیت کا مطلب پوچھا تو آپ نے فرمایا: بھانجے، یہ ذکر اس یتیم لڑکی کا ہے جو اپنے ولی کے قبضہ میں ہے اس کے مال میں شریک ہے اور اسے اس کا مال و جمال اچھا لگتا ہے چاہتا ہے کہ اس سے نکاح کر لے لیکن جو مہر وغیرہ اور جگہ سے اسے ملتا ہے اتنا یہ نہیں دیتا تو اسے منع کیا جا رہا ہے کہ وہ اس اپنی نیت کو چھوڑ دے اور کسی دوسری عورت سے جس سے چاہے اپنا نکاح کر لے، پھر اس کے بعد لوگوں نے رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم سے اسی کی بابت دریافت کیا اور آیت «وَيَسْتَفْتُونَكَ فِي النِّسَاءِ قُلِ اللَّـهُ يُفْتِيكُمْ فِيهِنَّ» [4-النساء:127] ‏ نازل ہوئی وہاں فرمایا گیا ہے کہ جب یتیم لڑکی کم مال والی اور کم جمال والی ہوتی ہے اس وقت تو اس کے والی اس سے بیرغبتی کرتے ہیں پھر کوئی وجہ نہیں کہ مال و جمال پر مائل ہو کر اس کے پورے حقوق ادا نہ کر کے اس سے اپنا نکاح کر لیں۔ [صحیح بخاری:4574] ‏صفحہ نمبر1492ہاں عدل و انصاف سے پورا مہر وغیرہ مقرر کریں تو کوئی حرج نہیں، ورنہ پھر عورتوں کی کمی نہیں اور کسی سے جس سے چاہیں نکاح کر لیں اگر چاہیں دو دو عورتیں اپنے نکاح میں رکھیں اگر چاہیں تین تین رکھیں اگر چاہیں چار چار، جیسے اور جگہ یہ الفاظ ان ہی معنوں میں ہیں، فرماتا ہے: «الْحَمْدُ لِلَّـهِ فَاطِرِ السَّمَاوَاتِ وَالْأَرْضِ جَاعِلِ الْمَلَائِكَةِ رُسُلًا أُولِي أَجْنِحَةٍ مَثْنَىٰ وَثُلَاثَ وَرُبَاعَ» [35- فاطر:1] ‏ الخ یعنی ” جن فرشتوں کو اللہ تعالیٰ اپنا قاصد بنا کر بھیجتا ہے ان میں سے بعض دو دو پروں والے ہیں بعض تین تین پروں والے بعض چار پروں والے فرشتوں میں اس سے زیادہ پر والے فرشتے بھی ہیں “ کیونکہ دلیل سے یہ ثابت شدہ ہے۔ لیکن مرد کو ایک وقت میں چار سے زیادہ بیویوں کا جمع کرنا منع ہے جیسے کہ اس آیت میں موجود ہے اور جیسے کہ سیدنا ابن عباس رضی اللہ عنہما اور جمہور کا قول ہے، یہاں اللہ تعالیٰ اپنے احسان اور انعام بیان فرما رہا ہے پس اگر چار سے زیادہ کی اجازت دینی منظور ہوتی تو ضرور فرما دیا جاتا، امام شافعی رحمہ اللہ فرماتے ہیں حدیث جو قرآن کی وضاحت کرنے والی ہے اس نے بتلا دیا ہے کہ سوائے رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کے کسی کے لیے چار سے زیادہ بیویوں کا بیک وقت جمع کرنا جائز نہیں اسی پر علماء کرام کا اجماع ہے۔ البتہ بعض شیعہ کا قول ہے کہ نو تک جمع کرنی جائز ہیں، بلکہ بعض شیعہ نے تو کہا ہے کہ نو سے بھی زیادہ جمع کر لینے میں بھی کوئی حرج نہیں کوئی تعداد مقرر ہے ہی نہیں، ان کا استدلال ایک تو رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کے فعل سے ہے جیسا کہ صحیح حدیث میں آ چکا ہے کہ آپ کی نو بیویاں تھیں [صحیح بخاری:5067] ‏ اور بخاری شریف کی معلق حدیث کے بعض راویوں نے گیارہ کہا ہے۔ [صحیح بخاری:267] ‏صفحہ نمبر1493سیدنا انس رضی اللہ عنہ سے مروی ہے کہ آپ نے پندرہ بیویوں سے عقد کیا تیرہ کی رخصتی ہوئی ایک وقت میں گیارہ بیویاں آپ کے پاس تھیں۔ انتقال کے وقت آپ کی نو بیویاں تھیں [بیہقی:289:مرسل] ‏ ہمارے علماء کرام رحمہ اللہ علیہم اس کے جواب میں فرماتے ہیں کہ یہ آپ کی خصوصیت تھی امتی کو ایک وقت میں چار سے زیادہ بیویاں پاس رکھنے کی اجازت نہیں، جیسے کہ یہ حدیثیں اس امر پر دلالت کرتی ہیں، سیدنا غیلان بن سلمہ ثقفی رضی اللہ عنہ جب مسلمان ہوتے ہیں تو ان کے پاس ان کی دس بیویاں تھیں۔ نبی کریم صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ارشاد فرماتے ہیں کہ ان میں سے جنہیں چاہو چار رکھ لو باقی کو چھوڑ دو چنانچہ انہوں نے ایسا ہی کیا پھر سیدنا رضی اللہ عنہ عمر کی خلافت کے زمانے میں اپنی ان بیویوں کو بھی طلاق دے دی اور اپنے لڑکوں کو اپنا مال بانٹ دیا، سیدنا عمر رضی اللہ عنہ کو جب یہ معلوم ہوا تو آپ نے فرمایا شاید تیرے شیطان نے بات اچک لی اور تیرے دل میں خیال جما دیا ہے کہ تو عنقریب مرنے والا ہے اس لیے اپنی بیویوں کو تو نے بھی الگ کر دیا کہ وہ تیرا مال نہ پائیں اور اپنا مال اپنی اولاد میں تقسیم کر دیا میں تجھے حکم دیتا ہوں کہ اپنی بیویوں سے رجوع کر لے اور اپنی اولاد سے مال واپس لے لے اگر تو نے ایسا نہ کیا تو تیرے بعد تیری ان مطلقہ بیویوں کو بھی تیرا وارث بناؤں گا کیونکہ تو نے انہیں اسی ڈر سے طلاق دی ہے اور معلوم ہوتا ہے کہ تیری زندگی بھی اب ختم ہونے والی ہے اور اگر تو نے میری بات نہ مانی تو یاد رکھ میں حکم دوں گا کہ لوگ تیری قبر پر پتھر پھینکیں جیسے کہ ابو رغال کی قبر پر پتھر پھینکے جاتے ہیں [سنن ترمذي:1128،قال الشيخ الألباني:صحیح] ‏ (‏مسند احمد شافعی ترمذی ابن ماجہ دارقطنی بیہقی وغیرہ)صفحہ نمبر1494مرفوع حدیث تک تو ان سب کتابوں میں ہے ہاں سیدنا عمر رضی اللہ عنہ والا واقعہ صرف مسند احمد میں ہی ہے لیکن یہ زیادتی حسن ہے، اگرچہ امام بخاری رحمہ اللہ نے اسے ضعیف کہا ہے اور اس کی اسناد کا دوسرا طریقہ بتا کر اس طریقہ کو غیر محفوظ کہا ہے مگر اس تعلیل میں بھی اختلاف ہے «وَاللهُ اَعْلَمُ» اور بزرگ محدثین نے بھی اس پر کلام کیا ہے لیکن مسند احمد والی حدیث کے تمام راوی ثقہ ہیں اور شرط شیخین پر ہیں ایک اور روایت میں ہے کہ یہ دس عورتیں بھی اپنے خاوند کے ساتھ مسلمان ہوئی تھیں ملاحظہ ہو۔ [بیہقی:183/7:حسن] ‏ اس حدیث سے صاف ظاہر ہو گیا کہ اگر چار سے زیادہ کا ایک وقت میں نکاح میں رکھنا جائز ہوتا تو نبی کریم صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم ان سے یہ نہ فرماتے کہ اپنی ان دس بیویوں میں سے چار کو جنہیں تم چاہو روک لو باقی کو چھوڑ دو کیونکہ یہ سب بھی اسلام لا چکی تھیں، یہاں یہ بات بھی خیال میں رکھنی چاہیئے کہ ثقفی کے ہاں تو یہ دس عورتیں بھی موجود تھیں اس پر بھی آپ نے چھ علیحدہ کرا دیں پھر بھلا کیسے ہو سکتا ہے کہ کوئی شخص نئے سرے سے چار سے زیادہ جمع کرے؟ «وَاللہُ سُبْحَانَہُ وَ تَعَالَىٰ اَعْلَمُ با الصواب» صفحہ نمبر1495چار سے زائد نہیں، وہ بھی بشرط انصاف ورنہ ایک ہی بیوی! ٭٭دوسری حدیث ابوداؤد ابن ماجہ وغیرہ میں ہے سیدنا عمیرہ اسدی رضی اللہ عنہ فرماتے ہیں میں نے جس وقت اسلام قبول کیا میرے نکاح میں آٹھ عورتیں تھیں میں نے رسول اللہ صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم سے ذکر کیا آپ نے فرمایا: ”ان میں سے جن چار کو چاہو رکھ لو“ [سنن ابوداود:2241/2242،قال الشيخ الألباني:صحیح] ‏ اس کی سند حسن ہے اور اس کے شواہد بھی ہیں راویوں کے ناموں کا ہیر پھیر وغیرہ ایسی روایات میں نقصان دہ نہیں ہوتا تیسری حدیث مسند شافعی میں ہے سیدنا نوفل بن معاویہ رضی اللہ عنہ فرماتے ہیں کہ میں نے جب اسلام قبول کیا اس وقت میری پانچ بیویاں تھیں مجھ سے نبی کریم صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے فرمایا: ”ان میں سے پسند کر کے چار کو رکھ لو اور ایک کو الگ کر دو“ میں نے جو سب سے زیادہ عمر کی بڑھیا اور بے اولاد بیوی ساٹھ سال کی تھیں انہیں طلاق دے دی [مسند شافعی:16/2:] ‏ پس یہ حدیثیں سیدنا غیلان رضی اللہ عنہ والی پہلی حدیث کی شواہد ہیں جیسے کہ امام بیہقی نے فرمایا۔ پھر فرماتا ہے ہاں اگر ایک سے زیادہ بیویوں میں عدل و انصاف نہ ہو سکنے کا خوف ہو تو صرف ایک ہی پر اکتفا کرو اور اپنی کنیزوں سے استمتاع کرو۔ جیسے اور جگہ ہے «وَلَن تَسْتَطِيعُوا أَن تَعْدِلُوا بَيْنَ النِّسَاءِ وَلَوْ حَرَصْتُمْ» [4-النساء:129] ‏ یعنی ” گو تم چاہو لیکن تم سے نہ ہو سکے گا کہ عورتوں کے درمیان پوری طرح عدل و انصاف کو قائم رکھ سکو پس بالکل ایک ہی طرف جھک کر دوسری کو مصیبت میں نہ ڈال دو “، ہاں یاد رہے کہ لونڈیوں میں باری وغیرہ کی تقسیم واجب نہیں البتہ مستحب ہے جو کرے اس نے اچھا کیا اور جو نہ کرے اس پر حرج نہیں۔صفحہ نمبر1496اس کے بعد کے جملے کے مطلب میں بعض نے تو کہا ہے کہ یہ قریب ہے ان معنی کے کہ تمہارے عیال یعنی فقیری زیادہ نہ ہو جیسے اور جگہ ہے آیت «وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ» » ‏ [9-التوبة:29] ‏ یعنی اگر تمہیں فقر کا ڈر ہو۔ عربی شاعر کہتا ہے: «‏فما یدری الفقیر متی غناہ ... وما یدری الغنی متی یعیل» یعنی ”فقیر نہیں جانتا کہ کب امیر ہو جائے گا ... اور امیر کو معلوم نہیں کہ کب فقیر بن جائے گا“ جب کوئی مسکین محتاج ہو جائے تو عرب کہتے ہیں «عال الرجل» یعنی ”یہ شخص فقیر ہو گیا“ غرض اس معنی میں یہ لفظ مستعمل تو ہے لیکن یہاں یہ تفسیر کچھ زیادہ اچھی نہیں معلوم ہوتی، کیونکہ اگر آزاد عورتوں کی کثرت فقیری کا باعث بن سکتی ہے تو لونڈیوں کی کثرت بھی فقیری کا سبب ہو سکتی ہے۔ پس صحیح قول جمہور کا ہے کہ مرادیہ ہے کہ یہ قریب ہے اس سے کہ تم ظلم سے بچ جاؤ، عرب میں کہا جاتا ہے «عال فی الحکم» جبکہ ظلم و جور کیا ہو، ابوطالب کے مشہور قصیدے میں ہے۔ «‏بمیزان قسط لا یخیس شعیرۃ» ... لہ شاہدمن نفسہ غیر عائل» بہترین ترازو ضمیر ہے یعنی ایسی ترازو سے تولتا ہے جو ایک جو برابر کی بھی کمی نہیں کرتا اس کے پاس اس کا گواہ خود اس کا نفس ہے جو ظالم نہیں ہے۔صفحہ نمبر1497ابن جریر میں ہے کہ جب کوفیوں نے سیدنا عثمان رضی اللہ عنہ پر ایک میں خط کچھ الزام لکھ کر بھیجے تو ان کے جواب میں خلیفہ رسول صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے لکھا کہ «إِني لسْتُ بميزانٍ لا أَعُول» میں ظلم کا ترازو نہیں ہوں صحیح ابن حبان وغیرہ میں ایک مرفوع حدیث اس جملہ کی تفسیر میں مروی ہے کہ اس کا معنی ہے تم ظلم نہ کرو [صحیح ابنvحبان:134/6] ‏ ابوحاتم رحمہ اللہ فرماتے ہیں اس کا مرفوع ہونا تو خطا ہے ہاں یہ سیدہ عائشہ رضی اللہ عنہا کا قول ہے اسی طرح «لا تعولوا» کے یہی معنی ہیں یعنی تم ظلم نہ کرو۔ سیدنا عبداللہ بن عباس، سیدہ عائشہ، رضی اللہ عنہما مجاہد، عکرمہ، حسن، ابو مالک، ابو زرین، نخعی، شعبی، ضحاک، عطاء خراسانی، قتادہ، سدی اور مقاتل بن حیان رحمہ اللہ علیہم [تفسیر ابن جریر الطبری:549/7-515] ‏ وغیرہ سے بھی مروی ہیں۔ عکرمہ رحمہ اللہ نے بھی ابوطالب کا وہی شعر پیش کیا ہے، امام ابن جریر رحمہ اللہ نے اسے روایت کیا ہے اور خود امام صاحب بھی اسی کو پسند فرماتے ہیں۔صفحہ نمبر1498پھر فرماتا ہے اپنی بیویوں کو ان کے مہر خوش دلی سے ادا کر دیا کرو جو بھی مقرر ہوئے ہوں اور جن کو تم نے منظور کیا ہو، ہاں اگر عورت خود اپنا سارا یا تھوڑا بہت مہر اپنی خوشی سے مرد کو معاف کر دے تو اسے اختیار ہے اور اس صورت میں بیشک مرد کو اس کا اپنے استعمال میں لانا حلال، طیب ہے، نبی کریم صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم کے بعد کسی کو جائز نہیں کہ بغیر مہر واجب کے نکاح کرے نہ یہ کہ جھوٹ موٹ مہر کا نام ہی نام ہو [تفسیر ابن جریر الطبری:553/7] ‏ ابن ابی حاتم میں سیدنا علی رضی اللہ عنہ کا قول مروی ہے کہ تم میں سے جب کوئی بیمار پڑے تو اسے چاہیئے کہ اپنی بیوی سے اس کے مال کے تین درہم یا کم و بیش لے ان کا شہد خرید لے اور بارش کا آسمانی پانی اس میں ملالے تو تین تین بھلائیاں مل جائیں گی آیت «فَإِن طِبْنَ لَكُمْ عَن شَيْءٍ مِّنْهُ نَفْسًا فَكُلُوهُ هَنِيئًا مَّرِيئًا» [4-النساء:4] ‏ تو مال عورت اور شفاء شہد اور مبارک بارش کا پانی۔ ابوصالح رحمہ اللہ فرماتے ہیں کہ لوگ اپنی بیٹیوں کا مہر آپ لیتے تھے جس پر یہ آیت اتری اور انہیں اس سے روک دیا گیا (‏ابن ابی حاتم اور ابن جریر) اس حکم کو سن کر لوگوں نے نبی کریم صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم سے پوچھا کہ ان کا مہر کیا ہونا چاہیئے؟ آپ نے فرمایا جس چیز پر بھی ان کے ولی رضامند ہو جائیں [بیہقی:239/7:مرسل و ضعیف] ‏ (‏ابن ابی حاتم) نبی کریم صلی اللہ علیہ وسلم نے اپنے خطبے میں تین مرتبہ فرمایا کہ ”بیوہ عورتوں کا نکاح کر دیا کرو“، ایک شخص نے کھڑے ہو کر پوچھا کہ یا رسول اللہ! ایسی صورت میں ان کا مہر کیا ہو گا؟ آپ نے فرمایا: ”جس پر ان کے گھر والے راضی ہو جائیں“ [بیہقی:239/7:منقطع و ضعیف] ‏ اس کے ایک راوی ابن بیلمانی ضعیف ہیں، پھر اس میں انقطاع بھی ہے۔صفحہ نمبر1499

آیت 3 وَاِنْ خِفْتُمْ اَلاَّ تُقْسِطُوْا فِی الْْیَتٰمٰی فَانْکِحُوْا مَا طَابَ لَکُمْ مِّنَ النِّسَآءِ مَثْنٰی وَثُلٰثَ وَرُبٰعَ ج اس آیت میں یَتَامٰیسے مراد یتیم بچیاں اور خواتین ہیں۔ یتیم لڑکے تو عمر کی ایک خاص حد کو پہنچنے کے بعد اپنی آزاد مرضی سے زندگی گزار لیتے تھے ‘ لیکن یتیم لڑکیوں کا معاملہ یہ ہوتا تھا کہ ان کے ولی اور سرپرست ان کے ساتھ نکاح بھی کرلیتے تھے۔ اس طرح یتیم لڑکیوں کے مال بھی ان کے قبضے میں آجاتے تھے ‘ اور یتیم لڑکیوں کے پیچھے ان کے حقوق کی نگہداشت کرنے والا بھی کوئی نہیں ہوتا تھا۔ اگر ماں باپ ہوتے تو ظاہر ہے کہ وہ بچی کے حقوق کے بارے میں بھی کوئی بات کرتے۔ لہٰذا ان کا کوئی پرسان حال نہیں ہوتا تھا۔ چناچہ فرمایا گیا کہ اگر تمہیں اندیشہ ہو کہ تم ان کے بارے میں انصاف نہیں کرسکو گے تو پھر تم ان یتیم بچیوں سے نکاح مت کرو ‘ بلکہ دوسری عورتیں جو تمہیں پسند ہوں ان سے نکاح کرو۔ اگر ضرورت ہو تو دو دو ‘ تین تین ‘ چار چار کی حد تک نکاح کرسکتے ہو ‘ اس کی تمہیں اجازت ہے۔ لیکن تم یتیم بچیوں کے ولی بن کر ان کی شادیاں کہیں اور کرو تاکہ تم ان کے حقوق کے پاسبان بن کر کھڑے ہو سکو۔ ورنہ اگر تم نے ان کو اپنے گھروں میں ڈال لیا تو کون ہوگا جو ان کے حقوق کے بارے میں تم سے باز پرس کرسکے ؟۔۔ منکرین سنت اور منکرین حدیث نے اس آیت کی مختلف تعبیرات کی ہیں ‘ جو یہاں بیان نہیں کی جا سکتیں۔ اس کا صحیح مفہوم یہی ہے جو سلف سے چلا آ رہا ہے اور جو حضرت عائشہ صدیقہ رض سے مروی ہے۔ مزید برآں تعدد ازدواج کے بارے میں یہی ایک آیت قرآن مجید میں ہے۔ اس آیت کی رو سے تعدد ازدواج کو محدود کیا گیا ہے اور چار سے زائد بیویاں رکھنے کو ممنوع کردیا گیا ہے۔ ّ فَاِنْ خِفْتُمْ اَلاَّ تَعْدِلُوْا فَوَاحِدَۃً یہ جو ہم نے اجازت دی ہے کہ دو دو ‘ تین تین ‘ چار چار عورتوں سے نکاح کرلو ‘ اس کی شرط لازم یہ ہے کہ بیویوں کے درمیان عدل کرو۔ اگر تمہیں اندیشہ ہو کہ اس شرط کو پورا نہیں کرسکو گے اور ان میں برابری نہ کرسکو گے تو پھر ایک ہی شادی کرو ‘ اس سے زائد نہیں۔ بیویوں کے مابین عدل و انصاف میں ہر اس چیز کا اعتبار ہوگا جو شمار میں آسکتی ہے۔ مثلاً ہر بیوی کے پاس جو وقت گزارا جائے اس میں مساوات ہونی چاہیے۔ نان نفقہ ‘ زیورات ‘ کپڑے اور دیگر مال و اسباب ‘ غرضیکہ تمام مادّی چیزیں جو دیکھی بھالی جاسکتی ہیں ان میں انصاف اور عدل لازم ہے۔ البتہ دلی میلان اور رجحان جس پر انسان کو قابو نہیں ہوتا ‘ اس میں گرفت نہیں ہے۔اَوْ مَا مَلَکَتْ اَیْمَانُکُمْ ط۔ یعنی وہ عورتیں جو جنگوں میں گرفتار ہو کر آئیں اور حکومت کی طرف سے لوگوں میں تقسیم کردی جائیں۔ وہ ایک علیحدہ معاملہ ہے اور ان کی تعداد پر کوئی تحدید نہیں ہے۔ ذٰلِکَ اَدْنآی الاَّ تَعُوْلُوْا ۔کہ بس ایک ہی بیوی کی طرف میلان ہے اور ‘ جیسا کہ آگے آئے گا ‘ دوسری معلق ہو کر رہ گئی ہیں کہ نہ وہ شوہروالیاں ہیں اور نہ آزاد ہیں کہ کہیں اور نکاح کرلیں۔

SequenceIn the previous verse, guardians were warned against pilferage or misappropriation in the property of orphans. The present verse is an extension of the basic command from another angle. Here they are warned against any attempt to marry orphaned girls under their guardianship hoping to get away by fixing a dower of their choice and claiming their properties as additional benefit.So, the Holy Qur'an has very clearly declared that every excuse, device or stratagem set up to usurp the property of the orphan is impermissible. It is the duty of the guardians that they should protect the rights of the orphans honestly.CommentaryOrphaned girls: Violation of their rights and its prevention:During Jahiliyyah guardians holding orphaned girls under their charge, used to pick up the ones who had good looks or owned properties of value and marry them or arranged to have them married to their sons. They would fix the dower of their choice, usually the lowest, and maintained them in whatever manner they elected for they were the very guardians and caretakers for them. Their fathers were not there to take care of their rights who would have certainly given them in marriage to a suitable person after full deliberation on all aspects a daughter faces in married life and would have made sure that they remain happy and well-covered.There is a narration in Sahih al-Bukhari from Sayyidah ` A'ishah ؓ which reports that an incident of this nature came to pass during the blessed time of the Holy Prophet ﷺ There was someone who had an orphaned girl under his guardianship. He had a fruit farm in which this girl held a share. This man married the orphaned girl and, rather than give her dower and things from his pocket, took her very share in the farm in his possession. Thereupon, the following verse was revealed:وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ أَلَّا تُقْسِطُوا فِي الْيَتَامَىٰ فَانكِحُوا مَا طَابَ لَكُم مِّنَ النِّسَاءِAnd if you fear that you will not do justice to the orphans, then marry the women you like...It means that if you apprehend that after marrying a girl under your guardianship, you cannot do justice to her, then, instead of marrying her, you should marry other women of your choice.The Marriage of MinorsThe word, يَتَامَىٰ 'yatama' in this verse means orphaned girls. In the terminology of the Shari` ah, a 'yatim' is a boy or girl who has not yet attained the age of puberty. So, this verse proves that the guardian' of an orphaned girl does have the right to give her in marriage while she is a minor and has not attained the age of puberty, but on condition that this decision is based on wisdom and the future welfare of the girl. This is to avoid unfair practices common in some communities where a grown up girl is married to a child without any regard for the difference in their ages or without any investigation into the living conditions or character of the boy.The orphaned girls who have attained the age of puberty are, no doubt, entitled to choose their husbands freely on the basis of their majority. Nevertheless, girls (in traditionally Islamic societies) tend to be modest and shy and usually would not come out strong or freely express their opinions in matters relating to their marriage inspite of being major and having the right to choose. As a result, they are likely to accept what their guardians do for them in good faith. If so, it is the bounden duty of guardians that they too should stay clear from taking any step that may violate the rights of orphaned girls.In short, this verse lays down the injunction that total vigilance should be observed to make sure that the marital rights of orphaned girls are not violated in any manner whatsoever. However, the responsibility of enforcing this injunction have not been directly placed on the shoulders of the government as is usual with laws promulgated by governments. Instead of that, people themselves have been commanded to fear Allah and do what is right. That is, should they apprehend injustice in marrying orphaned girls, they must cast off the idea and marry elsewhere from a wide range of choices available.Added to this Divine motivation to abide by prescribed law is the responsibility placed on its enforcing agencies in the government. It is their duty to oversee that there occurs no such violation of rights in the society. If it does, they must use the force of law to ensure that these rights are fulfilled as due.Polygamy and its currency before IslamThat one man could have more than one wife was something considered permissible in all religions of the world even before the advent of Islam. The custom prevailed in Arabia, India, Iran, Egypt, and Babylon and among peoples elsewhere. Its natural validity cannot be denied even to this day. The Europeans of the present age tried to break away from the practice of their predecessors and made multiplicity of marriage impermissible. It resulted in the multiplicity of concubines and girl-friends retained out of wedlock. It was the validity of the natural that there has been a consistent opinion bank in the West (though not so effective) which recognizes the efficacy of plurality of marriage. Davenport, the well-known Christian writer has deduced from the Bible that plurality of wives is not only favourable but is a source of blessing from God. Others such as Father Nixon, John Milton and Isac Taylor have supported this view strongly. Similarly, Vedic teachings permit unlimited number of wives, even in tens and thirteens and twenty sevens, at one time. Shri Krishna, a highly respected deity among Hindus, had hundreds of wives.The truth of the matter is that a religion or law which aims to establish an infra-structure of against adultery, it serves as a remedial approach to the problem of comparatively larger female population in some areas as compared to that of men. If such permission was not granted, mistresses and prostitutes will proliferate. This is why nations which do not permit plurality of wives must live in. rampant adultery (calling it 'free sex' hardly changes the reality). Even in our own time, if we look at the state of nations in Europe and America, we will see that they look down on what they call polygamy and put a ban on plurality of wives, but they permit a man to practice adultery with as many women as he can get under the cover of 'friendship', (and unlimited are the euphemisms invented to give it other names, such as, 'relationship', 'affair', 'consenting adults', 'union', 'partner' to get around the ban). Saying no to marriage and yes to adultery is certainly very strange!To be short, we can say that the custom of taking a large number of wives was prevailing before Islam without any imposition of limits. The history of nations and beliefs shows that no religion or law had drawn a line in this matter, neither the Jews and Christians, nor the Hindus and Aryans or the Zoroastrians.During the early period of Islam, this custom continued without being limited. As a result, people initially took too many wives to satisfy their greed. Later on they could not do justice to all of them and these wives of theirs lived like prisoners bound in the chains of marriage. Under such conditions, the idea of an equitable treatment of wives was practically non-existent. It was all a matter of personal choice or whim which could make the darling of the day a history of tomorrow. The concern for standing rights was a far cry.It was the Holy Qur'an which stopped this great injustice prevailing in the human society at large. It restricted the plurality or multiplicity of wives by declaring that keeping more than four women under the bond of marriage was forbidden (haram): In addition to that, stern warning was given against any contravention of the Divine command which emphatically demanded that equality in fulfilling the rights of women taken into the bond of marriage at the same time must be maintained faithfully. The words of the verse are:فَانكِحُوا مَا طَابَ لَكُم مِّنَ النِّسَاءِ مَثْنَىٰ وَثُلَاثَ وَرُ‌بَاعَThe expression مَا طَابَ ma taba' in this verse, as explained by Hasan al-Basri, Ibn Jubair and Ibn Malik, may the mercy of Allah be upon them, means ما حَلَّ 'ma halla', that is, women who are lawful for you.There are others who, taking the literal meaning of مَا طَابَ 'ma taba', have explained it to mean, 'whom you like'. But, there is no contradiction here. It could simply mean, 'women you like out of your natural inclination and that they be lawful for you in terms of the Shari` ah as well.'On the one hand, permission has been given in this verse that more than one wife can be conjoined in marriage in twos, threes or fours; while, on the other, after having taken the number to four, restriction was placed that more than four women cannot be taken in marriage at one given time.This particular restriction of the Holy Qur'an was made much more clear by a ruling given by the Holy Prophet ﷺ . It has been reported that, soon after the revelation of this verse a person by the name of Ghailan ibn Aslamah al-Thaqafi ؓ embraced Islam. At that time, he had ten wives who had also embraced Islam. Pursuant to the Qur'anic injunction, the Holy Prophet ﷺ asked him to select and retain four and release the rest by giving them divorce. Ghailan ibn Aslamah al-Thaqafi obeyed the command, retained four women and severed his marital link with the rest )Mishkat, p. 274, with reference to al-Tirmidhi and Ibn Nlajah). Citing another incident appearing as a complement of this very narration in the Musnad of Imam Ahmad (رح) will not really be out of place as it also relates to the rights of women.According to this report, Ghailan ibn Aslamah had retained four women in accordance with the rule of Shari'ah, but during the Caliphate of Sayyidna ` Umar ؓ he divorced them as well and distributed all his assets among his sons. When Sayyidna ` Umar ؓ found this out, he summoned him and said: "You have done this to deprive these women from your inheritance which is a gross injustice. So, revoke the divorce you have given to them right now and take your assets back from your sons, and if you do not do this, then, beware of a severe punishment".Qais ibn al-Harith al-Asadi ؓ says: 'When I embraced Islam, I had eight wives. I mentioned this to the Holy Prophet ﷺ . He said: "Keep four of them and divorce the rest." (Abu Daud, p. 304)According to a report in Musnad al-Imam al-Shafi, when Sayyidna Nawfal ibn Mu` awiyah ad-Daylami ؓ embraced Islam, he had five women in his nikah. The Holy Prophet ﷺ asked him too to divorce one woman. This incident appears in Mishkat as well (p. 274) with reference to Sharh al-Sunnah. In short, the blessed practice of the Holy Prophet ﷺ and his noble Companions very clearly illustrates the meaning of this verse, that is, conjoining more than four women in the bond of marriage is haram (forbidden).The Noble Wives of the Holy Prophet ﷺThe class of his person and the excellences of his virtues make the Holy Prophet ﷺ mercy and blessing personified. The main purpose of his life in this mortal world was to spread the call of Islam, purify people and teach the Qur'an. He, by his word and deed, made the teachings of Islam radiate all over the world. His unique style shows that he practiced what he taught. As such, there is no department of human life which can claim not to need the guidance of a prophet. So, right from the establishment of congregational prayer to maintaining good relations with wives, upbringing of children, even to the purificatory aspects of the human call of nature, there exists a roster of verbal and practical instructions left by him in the books of Hadith. They tell us in great details the things he did inside the walls of his home, how he related to his wives and how he answered questions posed by women who visited his home for this purpose. Such questions can be counted in hundreds, questions that highlight the intermediacy of his blessed wives through whom the Muslim ummah received necessary. guidance. Any other setting for this purpose would have been hard to bring about. So, this crucial religious need, the need for education, teaching and propagation made it all the more imperative that the Holy Prophet ﷺ marry the wives he did. Think of Sayyidah ` A'ishah ؓ . There are some two thousand and ten narrations reported from her. They cover a wide range of subjects which includes the explanation of the injunctions of the Holy Qur'an, religious questions and their answers, morals and manners and the سیرت Sirah of the Prophet of Islam. The narrations reported from Sayyidah Umm Salmah ؓ reach upto three hundred and seventy eight. All these are readily available in books of Hadith. In A` l-mul_Muwaqqi` in (v.l, p.9), Hafiz Ibn al-Qaiyyim has said: If the fatawa (religious rulings) of Sayyidah Umm Salmah ؓ عنہما which she gave after the demise of the Holy Prophet ﷺ were to be collected it could become a treatise on its own.The high rank Sayyidah ` A'ishah ؓ has in the narration and knowledge of Hadith and in jurisprudence and rulings is far too well-known to repeat here. Her disciples alone come to around two hundred. She was the beacon light of religious knowledge for an uninterrupted period of forty eight long years after the demise of the Holy Prophet ﷺ and was highly effective in carrying his mission forward.These brief remarks about two blessed wives of the Holy Prophet ﷺ have been given here just to serve as an example, otherwise there are many more lhadith narrations originating from others as well. Obviously, the benefits of such religious teaching and preaching came through the good offices of these sacred ladies.That the Prophet of Islam had the most exalted of objectives in sight, that he came in the golden line of great prophets, and that, as such, he saw the whole world as a unit and thought about correcting all human relationships individually, collectively and in families and in nations are spiritual ideals the modern man, the desire-driven robot of today, is simply incapable of conceptualizing. The most a he or she can do is to think of everybody else on his or her own personal analogy. This chronic malady in the intellectual makeup of the atheists and orientalists of West has taken them to feeling comfortable in perversity, the end-product of which is their mal-assessment of the otherwise unchallengeable character of the Holy Prophet ﷺ . According to their limits of 'civilized' thinking, his many marriages were simply an expression of his sexual desires (God forbid). To say the least, it can be said that anyone sane and just can never interpret his marriages to have issued forth from that source only if he were to even glance at his life and character.Right before the eyes of the Quraysh tribe of Makkah, he led a blame-free life in a way that he, when twenty five, married an aged widow with children (whose two earlier husbands had died) and went on living with her for the next twenty five years. It was also during this period that he used to leave home, sometimes for as long as a month, and stay in seclusion at the Cave of Hira devoting his time to the remembrance of his Lord. All his marriages came after his blessed age was beyond fifty. The first fifty years of his life, especially his younger years and; his youth, were all too visible to the people of Makkah. Nobody, not even an enemy, ever found an occasion to point an accusing finger at him about anything that could put his pristine piety and purity in doubt. His enemies tried whatever arrows they had in their quiver. They accused him of being a magician, a sorcerer, a poet, madman, liar, fabricator. But, they never dared say anything, not one word, about his innocent life, about whatever could refer to any crookedness of extra-marital sex or passion.Under these conditions, would it not be worth exploring as to why someone who had spent fifty years of his life in such righteousness and piety and in such peaceful abstinence from the good things of life, would be compelled to marry more than once? What was the urge? Anyone with the least fund of justice in him would not see any other reason behind this plurality of such marriages as being stated here. Now, let us go a little farther. Let us look at the very reality of these marriages as to how they came to pass.From age twenty five to the blessed age of fifty, Sayyidah Khadijah ؓ lived with him as the only wife. When she died, the marriage with Sayyidah Saudah and Sayyidah ` A'ishah ؓ was solemnized. But, it was Sayyidah Saudah ؓ who came to live with him while Sayyidah ` A'ishah ؓ continued to live with her father in view of her minority. It was after some years (in year 2 of the Hijrah) that Sayyidah ` A'ishah ؓ came to live with him at Madinah Munawwarah. This is the time when he was in his fifty fourth year. At this age he had two wives. What is known as plurality of marriages starts from this point. After one year, his marriage with Sayyidah Hafsah ؓ took place. After some months, Sayyidah Zainab bint Khuzaymah ؓ came into his nikah but died only eighteen months later. According to one report she lived only three months as his wife. Then, he was married to Sayyidah Umm Salmah ؓ in 4 A.H. and to Sayyidah Zainab hint Jahsh ؓ in 5 A.H. This is the time when he was fifty eight. At this fairly advanced age, he had four wives, although he could have had four wives immediately after the Qur'anic permission given to Muslims that they could, if need be, keep four wives. But, he never did this. Later, he married Sayyidah Juwayriyyah ؓ in 6 A.H., Sayyidah Umm Habibah ؓ ، in 7 A.H., Sayyidah Safiyyah ؓ in 7 A.H. and Sayyidah Maymunah ؓ later on in the same year.To sum up, we see that he lived with only one wife upto the age of fifty four years. In other words, he lived for twenty five years with Sayyidah Khadijah ؓ and four to five years with Sayyidah Saudah ؓ . After that, when he was fifty eight, he had four wives, the rest of the blessed wives came to live with him within a period of 2-3 years.It is worth mentioning here that, out of all the wives he had, there was only one who was married to him as a virgin, that is, the Mother of the Faithful, Sayyidah ` A'ishah al-Siddiqqah ؓ . Other than her, all wives, may Allah sanctify their honour, were widows (with the exception of lady Zainab bint Jahsh) - some of them were the ones who were already married twice and their husbands had died. This plurality, incidentally, came to pass in his later years.Let us not forget that his noble Companions ؓ ، both men and women who had seen him in the state of Islam, loved him dearly. They would have laid down their lives at his command. If he was so inclined to do, he would have married none but virgin wives. In fact, there was nothing to stop him from keeping a wife for one or two months and then take new ones in their place. But, he never did this.There is yet another fact which needs to be mentioned here. Our master, Sayyidna Muhammad al-Mustafa ﷺ was a true prophet of Allah and a prophet is no man of the mundane. He never follows his desires. What he does, he does with the leave and will of Allah. Once his prophethood is accepted, all objections stand eliminated. But, should there be one who not only refuses to accept a prophet as a prophet but goes a step farther and accuses that he allowed himself to take many wives to seek sexual gratification, then, such a person will be told: If this was so, why would the noble prophet proclaim the restriction against himself in matters relating to plurality of marriages, something which finds mention in the verse لَّا يَحِلُّ لَكَ النِّسَاءُ مِن بَعْدُ. (It is not lawful for you to take (more) wives after this - 33:52). That he proclaimed this restriction against his own self, openly and conclusively proved that whatever he did, he did with the leave and will of his Lord. As pointed out earlier, the educational benefits because of this plurality of marriages that reached the Muslim community, as well as the very injunctions of Islam, are really so many and so detailed that they can just not be taken up here even at their briefest. Those who study books of Alhadith would realize the truth of this statement. However, we do present here brief notes to serve as indicators.The Holy Prophet ﷺ had married Sayyidah Umm Salmah ؓ after her husband, Sayyidna Abu Salmah had died. When she came to live with him in his house alongwith her children from her previous husband, the Holy Prophet ؓ took care of her children and brought them up with love and concern. Thus he demonstrated through his conduct the way of loving and caring one must follow when bringing up step children. Of his blessed wives, she was the only one who came with her children. If none of his wives was like her, this aspect of the upbringing of step children would have remained practically undemonstrated and the vast community of Muslims would have remained deprived of any guidance in this matter. Her son, ` Umar ibn Abi Salmah ؓ says: I brought up in the lap of the Messenger of Allah ﷺ . Once, while eating with him, I was dunking my hand everywhere in the bowl. He said: سم اللہ و کل بیمینک و کل مما یلیک (Say the name of Allah and eat with your right hand and eat from what is in front of you) - (Bukbari, Muslim, from Mishkat, p. 363).Sayyidah Juwayriyyah ؓ came as a prisoner of Jihad. Like other prisoners, she too became one of the distributed and found herself in the share of Thabit ibn Qays or his cousin. But, she succeeded in making a deal with her master. The deal was that she would give him a certain amount of money against which he will release her. After making this arrangement, she came to the Holy Prophet ﷺ and sought financial assistance from him. He said: 'Shall I not tell you something much better than this? That I pay on your behalf and marry you?' She agreed with pleasure. Thereupon, he paid the amount due on her behalf and married her. This resulted in something unusually benign. Hundreds of Sayyidah Juwayriyyah’ s people had by that time passed into the ownership of the noble Companions because all of them had come as prisoners. When the Companions found out that the Holy Prophet ﷺ had married her, all of them released their respective slaves out of deference to the Holy Prophet ﷺ . Just imagine how elegant the propriety of their behaviour was, how genuine, how sublime. It was in view of their emotional realization that all these people have now become connected with the family of the Holy Prophet ﷺ in bonds of inlawship, that they simply could not have the audacity to keep them as slaves. So, they set all of them free. Sayyidah ` A'ishah ؓ says about this incident:فلقد اعتق بتزویجہ ایّاھا مأیۃ اھل بیت من بنی المصطلق فما اعلم امرأۃ اعظم برکۃ علی قومھا منھاBecause of his marriage with Juwayriyah, one hundred fami-lies from Banu al-Mustaliq became free. I know no other woman who proved to be greater in blessing for her people.Sayyidah Umm Habibah ؓ had become a Muslim in Makkah during the early days of Islam alongwith her husband. Later on, both husband and wife migrated to Ethiopia as members, of a caravan of several men and women. After reaching there, her husband became a Christian and it so happened that a few days later, he died.The Holy Prophet ﷺ proposed to her through the good offices of Najashi (Negus, Emperor of Ethiopia) which she accepted and it was in Ethiopia that the same Najashi gave her in marriage to the Holy Prophet ﷺ . It is interesting to note that Sayyidah Umm Habibah ؓ was the daughter of Sayyidna Abu Sufyan ؓ .He was, at that time, the leader of the group which regarded hostility to Islam as its main objective in life. They were always on the lookout for excuses to hurt Muslims and torture the Prophet of God. If they ever got the chance they would have not hesitated for a moment to eliminate him once and for all. When he found out about this marriage, he uttered the following words involuntarily: ھوالفحل لا یجدع انفہ literally: 'He is a man of valour. His nose cannot be cut off. The sense was that the Holy Prophet ﷺ is a man of honour. It is not easy to disgrace him. Here we are doing our best to disgrace him and there we see, right under our noses, that our daughter has become his wife.'In short, this marriage proved to be a weapon of psychological warfare. The ambitions of the leader of the kafirs کُفَّار against Muslims were watered down. That this marriage brought in its wake political gain for Islam and Muslims can hardly be denied in terms of the importance and need for it. This gain is certainly something God's farsighted and wise Messenger had, in all likelihood, in sight.Apart from the present summary view, those who have deeper access to the سیرت Sirah would find many more elements of wisdom in his plurality of marriages. The treatise entitled, Kathratul-Azwaj-li-Salhibil-Mi` raj کثرت الازواج لصاحب المعراج by my venerated master, Maulana Ashraf Thanavi (رح) ، is useful.The details we have provided here are there to remove the golden trap laid out by atheists and orientalists. Though unfortunate, yet the truth is that this trap sucks in a lot of educated but ignorant Muslims. They go into the spider's web and do not return because they do not know the Sirah of the noble Prophet ﷺ and the history of Islam directly from their authentic sources. Their knowledge of everything Islamic comes from (anti-Islam) books written by the so-called orientalists.Only one wife where injustice is likelyLet us now see what the Qur'an says after allowing upto four wives. It says: وَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ أَلَّا تُقْسِطُوا فِي الْيَتَامَىٰ فَانكِحُوا مَا طَابَ لَكُم مِّنَ النِّسَاءِ But, if you fear that you will not maintain equity, then, (keep to) one woman, or a bondwoman you own - 4:3.From here -we find out that having more than one wife is permissible and appropriate only on condition that equality can be maintained among all wives as required under the Shari'ah of Islam, and that the rights of all can be duly fulfilled. If one does not have the capability to discharge his obligations in this manner, the rule is to keep to only one wife. As stated earlier, the injustice of multiple marriages during Jahiliyyah without any considerations of rights of wives had made a mockery of this field of human relationship. So, the Qur'anic command was: If you are unable to do perfect justice between wives, then- restrict yourself to no more than one, or make do with a bondwoman you may own. At this point, please keep in mind that the Qur'anic expression مَا مَلَكَتْ أَيْمَانُكُمْ which means 'a bondwoman one may have', has very special conditions under which such possession becomes possible, conditions which generally do not just exist these days. Therefore, the act of starting to live with someone out of wedlock, just by declaring that she was a 'bondwoman' owned by the person involved, as something allowed by the Shari'ah of Islam, is non sequitur and patently Haram (unlawful). Any more details about it would simply be out of place here.The outcome (to be seen as a whole) is that the Qur'an has permitted having four wives in marriage which means that marriages entered into within this limit will be correct and permissible. But, under such a contingency, that of having more than one wife, it will be obligatory (wajib) to maintain justice and equality between them. Doing otherwise is a grave sin. So, anyone who thinks of having more than one wife should first think about all those factors and conditions around him and, more importantly, look into himself, introspect, weigh, deliberate and figure out realistically whether or not he has the ability, or the capability or quality to treat all of them equally and justly without causing the least infringement of their rights. If strong likelihood exists that one will not be able to come up to the standard and most probably will fail to maintain such justice and equality, then, having the audacity to go ahead and step into the bonds of more than one marriage is really a thoughtless plunge into a grave sin. One must stay away from doing something like this and, human condition being what it is, living with only one wife should be considered quite sufficient.Speaking legally, if a person marries more than four women in a single offer and acceptance, the marriage shall be void ab initio because nobody has the right to have more than four wives. As far as marriages within the limit of four are concerned, they shall be deemed as valid marriages all right, but any shortcoming in treating wives equally and justly will be an act of grave sin. In addition to that, any infringement of a wife's rights can be challenged in an Islamic Court and the aggrieved wife can receive redress from there.The Holy Prophet ﷺ has laid great emphasis on maintaining full equality and justice between all wives and he has given stern warnings against those who do otherwise. Above all, he has demonstrated the desirable ideal through his own conduct, reaching the outer limits of treating his wives equally even in matters in which equality is not mandatory.In a hadith, the Holy Prophet ﷺ has said: 'Anyone who has two wives and he cannot fulfill their rights equally and justly, shall be raised on the Day of Doom in a condition that one of his shoulders will be drooping down.' (Mishkat, p.278)We should, however, keep in mind that this equality of treatment is necessary in things which are within the control of man. For example, the coverage of personal expenses and parity in overnight stays. As for things out of man's control, such as the natural inclination of his heart which might tilt towards one of them, there is no accountability there for this is not a matter of choice. However, the binding condition is that this tilt should not affect matters which are within man's control. Our noble Prophet, may Allah bless him forever and ever, treated his venerated wives with full equality in everything within his control, yet he pleaded with his Lord:اللھم ھاذا قسمی فیما اَملِکُ فلا تلمنی فیما تملِکَ ولا اَملِکُO Allah, this is my 'equalization' in what I control. So, do not hold me accountable in matters You control and I do not.Obviously, something even an infallible Messenger of God is not able to do, how can someone else claim to have the ability to do it? Therefore, in another verse of the Holy Qur'an, this 'matter out of man's control' has been mentioned in the following words:وَلَن تَسْتَطِيعُوا أَن تَعْدِلُوا بَيْنَ النِّسَاءِAnd you shall be unable to maintain perfect equality between the women - 4:129.Here, it has been made clear that love and the tilt of the heart are something out of man's control. It is beyond man's power to achieve perfect equality of treatment in what comes from the territory of the heart. But, even this involuntary conduct has not been left totally unchecked and unbalanced. In order to correct it, it was said: 3. I; فَلَا تَمِيلُوا كُلَّ الْمَيْلِ (So, do not tilt, the full tilt). It means: If you love one of your wives more than the other, there is nothing you can do about it. But, total indifference and heedlessness towards the other wife is not permissible even under this situation. The justice and equality mentioned in the sentence فَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ أَلَّا تَعْدِلُوا فَوَاحِدَةً (If you fear that you will not maintain equity, then { keep to) one woman) refers to the same justice in matters of choice and volition, any discrepancy in which is a great sin. So much so, that a person who sees the danger of his getting involved with this sin has been instructed not to marry more than one woman.A doubt and its answerBecause some people have lost sight of details given above, they have fallen into a strange error. When they compare the verse under discussion, 4:3, and the verse quoted just a little earlier, 4:129, they are confused. They think: Here is this verse from Surah al-Nis-a' which carries the command: 'If you fear that you will not maintain equity, then (keep to) one woman. Then, there is this second verse which says categorically that justice and equality (among wives) is just not possible. As a result, they doubt, having more than one wife should not be permissible. But, such people should ask themselves: If, through these verses, Allah Almighty aimed at putting a cap over more than one marriage, what need was there to go into all these details? Why would the Qur'an say: فَانكِحُوا مَا طَابَ لَكُم مِّنَ النِّسَاءِ مَثْنَىٰ وَثُلَاثَ وَرُ‌بَاعَ that is, 'marry women you like, in twos and threes and fours?' And then, what would be the meaning of saying: فَإِنْ خِفْتُمْ أَلَّا تَعْدِلُوا that is, 'if you fear that you will not do justice' - for, in this situation, injustice is certain. How can we then explain the element of fear which would become meaningless?In addition to this, the words and deeds of the Holy Prophet ﷺ and the noble Companions ؓ and their consistent practice prove the fact that having more than one wife (upto four) was never prevented in Islam. The truth of the matter is what has been stated earlier, that is, the first verse of Surah al-Nisa' talks about justice and equality in what man can do by choice while the second verse points out to man's inability to control lack of equal treatment when it comes to love and emotional inclination. Therefore, these two verses have no contradiction, nor does it prove that plurality of marriages is absolutely forbidden.Towards the end of the verse, it was said: ذَٰلِكَ أَدْنَىٰ أَلَّا تَعُولُوا (It will be closer to your not doing injustice). In this verse, the word ادنیٰ ('adna' ) has been derived from ذُنُّون (dunuwun) which means nearness and the other word لَّا تَعُولُوا (la ta` ulu) is from عالَ یعولُ ، مالَ یمیلُ which means inclination or tilt. Here it has been used in the sense of impermissible inclination culminating in injustice and wrong-doing.It means 'what you have been told in this verse (that is, in absence of being unable to do justice, having only one wife or making do with one's bondwoman) is something which, if you elect to follow it, will help you in staying safe from doing any injustice and the chances of any additional oppression and transgression will be eliminated.There is a doubt here: When a man has one wife, there will be just no chance of injustice. Why then, it was said, by adding the word, 'adna that 'it will be closer to your not doing injustice', instead, the statement should have been something to the effect that it will make you totally safe from this injustice.The answer is: The addition of the word, اَدنیٰ 'adna (closer) in the text is there to point out to all those people who would not hesitate in inflicting all sorts of injustices on even one wife. So, to block this source of injustice, the absence of more than one wife is not enough. In this situation, however, the likelihood does exist that the danger of injustice will decrease and you will come closer to justice. But, the complete deliverance from injustice and oppression will only be possible when the rights of one wife are totally and fully given and she is treated fairly and generously, forgiving her shortcomings and being patient with her crooked ways.