Surah Al-Isra • Ayah 16
BY
Word-by-Word Analysis
Click any word below to tag it with linguistic or thematic terminology.
Verse Tags
Meanings of AmarnaThe commentators differed over the meaning of this word. It was said that the phrase translated here as "Amarna those who live luxuriously. Then, they transgress therein" means, "We send Our decree upon them" as Allah says elsewhere:أَتَاهَآ أَمْرُنَا لَيْلاً أَوْ نَهَارًا(Our decree reaches it by night or by day) For Amarna cannot mean "Our command" because Allah does not command or enjoin immorality. Or, they said it means that Allah subjugated them to commit immoral deeds, so they deserved the punishment. Or it was said that it means: "We commanded them to obey Us, but they committed immoral sins, so they deserved punishment." This was reported from Ibn Jurayj from Ibn `Abbas, and it is also the view of Sa`id bin Jubayr.أَمَرْنَا مُتْرَفِيهَا فَفَسَقُواْ فِيهَا(Amarna those who live luxuriously. Then, they transgress therein,) `Ali bin Abi Talhah reported that Ibn `Abbas said: this means "We gave power to the evil people, so they committed sin therein (in the town), and because they did that, Allah destroyed them with the punishment." This is similar to the Ayah:وَكَذلِكَ جَعَلْنَا فِي كُلِّ قَرْيَةٍ أَكَـبِرَ مُجْرِمِيهَا(And thus We have set up in every town great ones of its wicked people) 6:133 This was also the view of Abu Al-`Aliyah, Mujahid and Ar-Rabi' bin Anas.وَإِذَآ أَرَدْنَآ أَن نُّهْلِكَ قَرْيَةً أَمَرْنَا مُتْرَفِيهَا فَفَسَقُواْ فِيهَا(And when We decide to distroy a town (populaton), Amarna those who live luxuriously. Then, they transgress therein,) Al-`Awfi reported that Ibn `Abbas said, (it means) "We increase their numbers. This was also the view of `Ikrimah, Al-Hasan, Ad-Dahhak and Qatadah, and it was reported from Malik and Az-Zuhri.وَكَمْ أَهْلَكْنَا مِنَ الْقُرُونِ مِن بَعْدِ نُوحٍ وَكَفَى بِرَبِّكَ بِذُنُوبِ عِبَادِهِ خَبِيرَا بَصِيرًا
تقدیر اور ہمارے اعمال ٭٭مشہور قرأت تو «أَمَرْنَا» ہے اس امر سے مراد تقدیری امر ہے جیسے اور آیت میں ہے: «أَتَاهَآ أَمْرُنَا لَيْلاً أَوْ نَهَارًا» [10-يونس:24] ” یعنی وہاں ہمارہ مقرر کردہ امر آجاتا ہے، رات کو یا دن کو۔ “ یاد رہے کہ اللہ برائیوں کا حکم نہیں کرتا۔ مطلب یہ ہے کہ وہ فحش کاریوں میں مبتلا ہو جاتے ہیں اور اس وجہ سے مستحق عذاب ہو جاتے ہیں کہ ہم انہیں اپنی اطاعت کے احکام کرتے ہیں اور برائیوں میں لگ جاتے ہیں پھر ہمارا سزا کا قول ان پر راست آ جاتا ہے جن کی قرأت «أَمُرْنَا» ہے وہ کہتے ہیں مطلب یہ ہے کہ وہاں کے سردار ہم بدکاروں کو بنا دیتے ہیں وہ وہاں اللہ تعالیٰ کی نافرمانیاں کرنے لگتے ہیں یہاں تک کہ عذاب الٰہی انہیں اس بستی سمیت تہس نہس کر دیتا۔ جیسے فرمان ہے: «وَكَذلِكَ جَعَلْنَا فِي كُلِّ قَرْيَةٍ أَكَـبِرَ مُجْرِمِيهَا» [6-الأنعام:123] ” اور اسی طرح ہم نے ہر بستی میں وہاں کے رئیسوں ہی کو جرائم کا مرتکب بنایا۔ “ سیدنا ابن عباسؓ رضی اللہ عنہما فرماتے ہیں یعنی ہم ان کے دشمن بڑھا دیتے ہیں وہاں سرکشوں کی زیادتی کر دیتے ہیں۔ مسند احمد کی ایک حدیث میں ہے بہترین مال جانور ہے جو زیادہ بچے دینے والا ہو یا راستہ ہے جو کھجور کے درختوں سے گھرا ہوا ہو۔ [مسند احمد:468/3:ضعیف] جیسے آپ کا قول ہے گناہ والیاں نہ کہ اجر پانے والیاں۔ [سنن ابن ماجه:1578،قال الشيخ الألباني:ضعیف] صفحہ نمبر4666
فَحَقَّ عَلَيْهَا الْقَوْلُ فَدَمَّرْنٰهَا تَدْمِيْرًایہاں کسی بستی پر عذاب استیصال کے نازل ہونے کا ایک اصول بتایا جا رہا ہے کہ کسی بھی معاشرے میں اس کا سبب وہاں کے دولت مند اور خوشحال لوگ بنتے ہیں۔ یہ لوگ علی الاعلان اللہ تعالیٰ کے احکام کی نافرمانیاں کرتے ہیں۔ اس سلسلے میں ان کی دیدہ دلیری کے سبب ان کی رسی مزید دراز کی جاتی ہے یہاں تک کہ وہ اپنی عیاشیوں اور من مانیوں میں تمام حدیں پھلانگ کر پوری طرح عذاب کے مستحق ہوجاتے ہیں عوام انہیں ان کے کرتوتوں سے باز رکھنے کے لیے کوئی کردار ادا نہیں کرتے بلکہ ایک وقت آتا ہے جب وہ بھی ان کے ساتھ جرائم میں شریک ہوجاتے ہیں اور یوں ایسا معاشرہ اللہ کے عذاب کی لپیٹ میں آجاتا ہے۔ ایسے میں صرف وہی لوگ عذاب سے بچ پاتے ہیں جو نہی عن المنکر کا فریضہ ادا کرتے رہے ہوں۔
SequencePrevious verses said that it is the customary practice of Allah Ta` ala that he does not send punishment upon a people until the commandments of Allah reach them through the blessed prophets which they still refuse to obey. Given in the verses cited above is what happens on the other side when the messages of Allah and His Messenger do reach a people and they still show contumacy, then, a mass punishment is sent over them.CommentaryA doubt and its answerA surface look at the expressions: اِذا اَرَدنَا (idha aradna: when We intend) and, after that: اَمَرنَا (amarna: We command) in verse 12 could have triggered the doubt that destroying those people was the divine purpose from the very beginning. Therefore, they were first commanded to believe and obey through the prophets, then their indulgence in sin was made to be the cause of punishment. All this came from none but Allah Ta` ala. Is it not? If so, would these innocent people not be just about a helpless and excusable lot? The answer is that Allah Ta’ ala has given man reason and choice and has determined the ways of reward and punishment. Now, if someone elects to do nothing but what brings punishment, then, it is the customary practice of Allah that He would activate the causes that bring the same punishment. Thus, the real cause of punishment they receive is nothing but their own resolve and determination to remain on the side of disbelief and sin. Since this is no simple intention, therefore, they cannot be helpless and excusable.Another Tafsir of this verseThe well known sense of the word: اَمَرنَا (amarna) is the same as appears above, that is, 'We commanded.' But, the renditions or versions (qira’ at) of this word differ. In one rendition opted for by Abu ` Uthman an-Nahdi, Abu Raja', Abu al-'Aliyah and Mujahid, this word has appeared with a double sound on the letter mim. Rendered as: اَمَّرَنَا (ammarna), it means 'We made affluent people leaders and rulers, who then sank in sin, and thus became the cause of punishment for the whole people.'There is a qira'ah (rendition or version) of this word credited to Sayyidna ` Ali and Ibn ` Abbas ؓ where it has been recited as: اَمَرنَا (aamarna) and which has also been explained by them as having the sense of: اَکثَرنَا (aktharna: We increase the number of). Thus it comes to mean: 'When Allah Ta` ala sends punishment on a certain people, its initial sign is that the number of the reckless rich is increased among them and they, through their spate of sins, become the cause of making the punishment descend upon the entire people.'The outcome of the first qira'ah is that such affluent people are made the rulers of a people. The outcome of the second qira'ah is that the number of such people is increased in that society. Both versions show that the government of the 'affluent' or the abundance of such people in a society is not something to be happy about, rather, is a sign of divine punishment.Let us recapitulate. When Allah Ta’ ala is angry with a people and intends to make a punishment descend upon them, there appears an initial sign of it. People who love to wallow in wealth and power are made the ruling custodians of their affairs, or, even if they do not become their actual political rulers, the number of such people is increased among a people. In both these cases, the result is the same. Drunk with the pleasures they can buy, acquire or appropriate with their affluence and influence, they start caring less for anything else, disobey the will and command of Allah personally as well as lead the trail for others to follow in their footsteps. In consequence, comes the punishment of Allah Ta’ ala all over them.The influence of the rich over a people is a natural phenomenonBy particularly mentioning affluent people who use their wealth to pursue a life of luxury, it has been indicated that the masses are naturally affected with the deeds and morals of those rich among them and those who rule over them. When these people get used to misdeeds, the whole nation follows suit and takes to misdeeds (as the only available norm of social survival). Therefore, those who have been blessed with wealth by Allah Ta’ ala should be more concerned with the correction of their deeds and morals - lest they fall into the trap of a luxurious life style, are heedless to self-correction, and make the entire nation go astray because of them. If so, the curse of the misdeeds that issue forth from their nation will fall on them too.
The Abbasid Revolution (al-Dawla al-Abbasiyya) began in Khurasan in 747 CE under Abu Muslim al-Khurasani, rallying non-Arab Muslims (mawali) who resented Arab tribalism and the Umayyads' departure from Islamic egalitarianism. Within three years, the last Umayyad caliph, Marwan II, was defeated at the Battle of the Great Zab (750 CE) and killed in Egypt. The Abbasids invited eighty Umayyad princes to a peace banquet and massacred them all, with one prince (Abd al-Rahman I) escaping to establish an Umayyad emirate in Spain.
In February 1258 CE, Hulagu Khan's Mongol forces sacked Baghdad over 40 days in one of history's most catastrophic civilizational destructions. The last Abbasid Caliph, al-Musta'sim, was executed; contemporary estimates (likely exaggerated) suggest hundreds of thousands were killed. The Tigris reportedly ran black with ink from destroyed library books and red with blood. The Bayt al-Hikma was destroyed; five centuries of accumulated Islamic scholarship vanished. Ibn Khaldun later cited this catastrophe as the definitive example of civilizational collapse through internal weakness.
Ibn Khaldun observed that dynasties typically last three to four generations: the founders possess strong asabiyyah and hardihood; the second generation maintains power through inherited virtue; the third generation, raised in luxury, becomes soft and dependent on mercenaries; the fourth generation presides over collapse. This three-generation cycle — roughly 120 years — repeats throughout Islamic and world history: Umayyads, Abbasids, Fatimids, Ayyubids, Mamluks, and Ottomans all roughly conform to this pattern. The Quran warns of exactly this dynamic: nations that grew complacent in their blessings were destroyed (28:58; 17:16).
No analysis published under this lens
Submit a research-backed analysis or ask AI to start mapping this perspective.